Why Fair Pay Means Better Public Services

Imagine needing to call 911 in the middle of a medical emergency, only to be placed on hold because there are not enough dispatchers to take your call. Or perhaps a less urgent but still stressful situation: you have unexpected water damage in your home, and when you apply for a permit to repair your walls and floors, you find yourself in a months-long backlog of permit requests before you.  

Whether it’s dialing 911 or applying for a permit, residents expect reliable, responsive, and high-quality service. Unfortunately, staffing shortages, unmotivated employees, or pay inequity tied to a local government agency’s compensation planning can directly impact everyday experiences for residents.  

Not surprisingly, the impact of workforce stability and staffing on resident service delivery is only increasing. And to compound the situation, according to the Partnership for Public Service, hiring in government is harder than ever—less than 1 in 5 Gen Z workers are interested in public service. That’s a problem for agencies looking to maintain a stable, well-staffed, resident-focused work environment.  

While compensation is often viewed as a cost center, in the public sector, it’s also a performance driver and a trust builder. The way agencies plan, benchmark, and manage pay doesn’t just impact recruitment and retention—it is critical in fostering stronger service delivery and higher community satisfaction. 

Understanding the Compensation-Service Connection 

Whether due to an aging workforce or lack of talent interest in pursuing public service work, many agencies struggle to retain and attract new employees because the compensation data they are working with during negotiations is out of date. According to the Public Sector HR Association only 22% of agencies feel very confident their pay benchmarks are accurate and competitive. When compensation practices fall behind, it affects more than agency recruiting and retention efforts; it changes the way residents experience government services.  

Why does compensation matter so much for public-facing service? There are three key reasons: 

• Retention and Stability: Competitive pay reduces turnover, which in turn, means residents interact with experienced, knowledgeable staff who can solve problems more efficiently 

• Consistency in Service Delivery: When staff are not cycling in and out, processes are more predictable and reliable, training is more effective, and services are delivered without disruption 

• Public Trust Through Transparency: When pay practices are equitable and sustainable, they reinforce a sense of fairness—both internally among employees and externally among residents 

Compensation decisions don’t exist in a vacuum—they can have a downward ripple effect that impacts the workforce, the services they deliver, and the trust residents have in their governments. Visually speaking, it can look like this: pay practices → workforce stability → service quality → resident satisfaction → public trust. 

The Hidden Cost of Staff Turnover 

For HR and finance leaders, staff turnover is expensive and disruptive and can have broader implications for the community at large. The Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) estimates the cost of replacing a single employee can cost anywhere from 50-200% of their annual salary (depending on the role), and Gallup finds it can be 1.5-2x, on average. Other Gallup research reveals that 51% of employees are actively seeking new jobs. And, for public agencies, that cost multiplies when turnover creates service disruptions. These costs can show up as overtime pay to cover gaps, extended training cycles, and long delays that erode resident trust. 

Compensation planning, therefore, isn’t just about attracting or retaining talent—it’s a cost avoidance strategy. By reducing turnover through fair pay, agencies protect both their budgets and their community reputation. 

Case Example: How Faster 911 Dispatcher Response Times Bring Greater Community Calm 

911 Call Centers are the lifeline between residents and emergency responders. But they’re also one of the most high-stress public service jobs, with turnover rates in some regions exceeding 30% annually. 

High turnover doesn’t just strain agency budgets with recruiting and training costs—it affects response quality. Newer dispatchers often take longer to process calls or may lack the same calm and composure more seasoned dispatchers have under pressure. 

When agencies benchmark dispatcher pay competitively and provide career growth pathways, research shows that turnover drops. With seasoned dispatchers on staff, call accuracy improves, response times shrink, and residents feel safer knowing their emergencies are handled by trained professionals who know the job inside and out. 

In communities where dispatcher retention has improved through better pay alignment, resident satisfaction surveys often show increased confidence in emergency services, reinforcing the connection between compensation and trust. 

Case Example: Picking Up the Pace at Permitting Offices to Speed Compliance 

Permitting offices are one of the most common direct contact points between residents and local government. Whether it’s a homeowner trying to remodel or a small business seeking approvals, efficiency and clarity matter. 

When turnover is high in these roles, residents encounter inconsistent guidance and delays, creating frustration and distrust in the process. For businesses, that can even mean lost revenue. 

Agencies that stabilize permitting staff through competitive pay practices see measurable improvements: 

• Shorter processing times due to staff with institutional knowledge 

• Consistent application of rules, reducing complaints and appeals 

• Friendlier interactions, as employees feel less burned out and more supported 

The result? Residents view their government as more responsive, accessible, and fair. What might feel like a small back-office adjustment—recalibrating pay—has a direct impact on the public’s experience of government efficiency. 

Case Example: Ensuring Continuity in the Classroom 

Few areas highlight the link between compensation and resident satisfaction more than education. Parents value stability in classrooms, and students thrive when teachers remain year after year. 

Yet teacher turnover remains a persistent challenge, particularly in districts where pay lags behind regional benchmarks. The consequences are well-documented: disrupted learning, inconsistent instruction, and parents losing confidence in the district. 

By using compensation benchmarking and labor costing tools, districts can: 

• Align salaries to competitive market rates 

• Prevent pay compression that drives mid-career teachers away 

• Forecast long-term budget impacts of raises to sustain stability 

The payoff isn’t just happier teachers. Stable classrooms lead to stronger student outcomes, greater parental trust, and communities that view their schools as reliable cornerstones. 

Negotiation and Transparency Challenges 

From classrooms to emergency call centers to city permitting offices, high turnover leaves its mark on how residents experience government services. One factor behind these disruptions is less visible: negotiations with staff at the bargaining table. Often, agencies enter negotiations without the right information, armed with outdated or incomplete data. In a report released by NASPE, fewer than 30% of HR leaders use current compensation data, and fewer than 20% have automated tools to track compensation trends. The lack of reliable data makes it harder to plan ahead and leaves agencies vulnerable to things such as unsustainable contracts, costly compliance issues, or late-stage surprises. 

From Real Time Data Insights to Measurable Impact: The TrueComp Difference 

That’s where data analytic solutions, like what TrueComp provides, comes in. TrueComp helps HR and Finance leaders modernize workflows with real time insights and data and make faster, more accurate, confident, and fair compensation decisions that directly influence budget planning, labor negotiations, and forecasting—decisions that have a direct impact on the overall resident experience. 

TrueComp’s solutions bridge the gap between compensation planning and resident satisfaction, and can equip agencies to attract, retain, and plan sustainably. With tools like TrueComp Benchmarking and Labor Costing, agencies can: 

• Show how pay aligns with market norms 

• Justify raises or adjustments with objective data 

• Demonstrate long-term fiscal sustainability 

With TrueComp, agencies no longer need to lean on incomplete or outdated benchmarks. Instead, every decision is backed by current, verified data. This pivots the negotiation from reactionary to proactive, and helps HR and Finance team anticipate workforce needs before they become a staffing or service disruption issue. The result is a boost in agency efficiency to deliver for the community it serves.  

Outcomes that Matter: Better Pay and Better Resident Service  

Resident satisfaction is built on more than policies and infrastructure—it’s built on the people who deliver services every day. From emergency response to permitting to classrooms, compensation practices shape the quality, consistency, and reliability of those services.  

By investing in competitive and equitable pay, agencies strengthen public trust and help ensure service delivery. With the right tools and insights, they can gain confidence, clarity, and the ability to plan smarter and serve residents better. 

Ready to see how smarter compensation planning can improve service delivery in your community? 

Watch a Demo